Old
Industrial Sites Dot Our Nation.........
How effective is EPA?
Here is a story about industrial sites abandoned in
Indianapolis, Indiana. The conditions described are common to many
major metropolitan areas in the United States. I can remember as a
young inspector in Kansas City, Missouri being sent out to
evaluate abandoned factories and warehouses for potential
developers and entrepreneurs to see if it would be cost effective
for them to utilize even part of the huge
sites. Sometimes the inspection was to investigate
complaints about the buildings needing to be condemned. There
were always drums of unknown products at these sites, just
rusting away. It seems as if current regulations just allow
these companies to walk away without any
consequences..........................
Asbestos, the
continuing killer..............
By now most of us are
familiar with the advantage of developed nations over undeveloped
ones (also called third world nations) regarding the use of coal and
carbon emissions. The argument is that the countries just now
developing economically cannot afford scrubbers and "expensive"
environmental regulations on hazardous/waste disposal and polluting
emissions. Well, what about developed nations that sell poisonous
products to these countries? These nations are selling products
to undeveloped nations such as asbestos they spend millions each
year to remove and eradicate from their own buildings. There are
actually only two, Russia and Canada. Russia exports about 40% of
the world production, Canada 10%. China is the second biggest
producer besides Russia, but China is still considered a
developing country. Here is the Wikepedia article about the
current state of
asbestos. In the
Unites States, asbestos has not been mined since 2002. In 1989 EPA
tried to ban it, but this was overturned in 1991 so that now small
amounts of asbestos are still contained within products we buy
today. The Canadian mine company outlined in this article actually ceased production in 2002
because of a slump in word demand, but as you can see, that is
now SO over
with..........................
The Haliburton
Loophole once again rises from the surface of the
cesspool........
Several weeks ago we
featured a NY
Times opinion piece about the Haliburton Loophole, a
gift from Congress to the Bush Administration, specifically Dick
Cheney, that exempted the process of hydraulic fracturing,
essentially invented by Haliburton (though is is a carryover from
the methods of hydraulic mining practiced for centuries), from EPA
regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act.
While we are
essentially against governmental regulations of free enterprise, it
is obvious in the case of the environment that we all have to be
protected, and it is also obvious that the companies and
corporations seeking to make a profit have a less than stellar
record of cleaning up their own messes. There is also something
about the 1872 Mining Act where companies don't have to pay us, the
taxpayer, anything for minerals they take from the ground that is
inherently crapola in this day and age.
Now we find out that
Congress (including Democrats) looked the other
way when they had knowledge
this was a polluting practice as they were passing this
loophole! In the search for more natural gas (which is
not a solution to clean energy; it comes from oil, it is a finite
resource, and to even think it is some kind of permanent solution to
our energy woes is pure folly. However, T. Boone Pickens thinks that
it is a temporary way to get us off OPEC oil by at least 50%, so
maybe temporary is not a bad word) in the Marcellus Shale
fields, a massive gas deposit stretching from New York to Tennessee,
new
problems and concerns are
surfacing............The companies involved in this blatant
pollution are claiming the chemicals involved are
proprietary and a trade
secret, but unfortunately for them (and fortunately
for us) there are
vays...............
Here you can
watch the catastrophic pipe failure at the Silver Eagle Refinery
last November. The US Chemical Safety Board said it was due to
faulty thickness testing. What do the oil companies do with those
obscene profits, anyway? Strip clubs can only make so much money,
you know........